It is ideal for key management slots to be filled from outside turnaround as well as rapid-growth situations.
So, the correct option is A.
Different sets of managerial skills are required to implement the strategy and ensure that the organization does so successfully. Strategy execution is primarily operations-driven, focusing on the management of people, business processes, and organizational structure, as opposed to strategy formulation, which is largely an analysis-driven activity focused on market conditions and the company's resources and capabilities.
Working well with and through others, developing and bolstering competitive capabilities, and developing a suitable organizational structure are all necessary for successful strategy execution. Teamwork is necessary for successful strategy execution. Every manager is accountable for implementing strategies in their spheres of influence, and every employee actively contributes to this process.
Learn to know more about Rapid growth on
brainly.com/question/20972252
#SPJ4
Answer:
$1,600
Explanation:
Revenue is recognized as and when the <em>control</em> of a good or service is transferred to the customer.
Total Hours = 10 hours × 8 weeks
= 80 hours
Use the <em>rate of pay at the utility office</em> to determine the contribution revenue for Red Wolf Society
Revenue = 80 hours × $20 per hour
= $1,600
Answer:
Jenkins Manufacturing
Joe should produce using the new equipment.
Explanation:
a) Costs incurred using the old equipment:
Variable costs = $45,000 ($50 x 900)
Fixed costs = $40,000
Total costs = $85,000
Operating Loss = $22,000 ($63,000 - 85,000)
b) Costs incurred using the new equipment:
Variable costs = $22,500 ($25 x 900)
Fixed costs = $60,000
Total costs = $82,500
Operating Loss = $19,500 ($63,000 - 82,500)
Production using the new equipment would reduce the operating loss by $2,500.
Answer:
The benefits of a High Speed Rail in California:
- It becomes a feasible alternative to air travel, because it can be either cheaper, or even faster, since passengers do not have to spend as much time on a train station as they do on an airport.
- If demand is high enough, state highways can become less congested, because many people who would otherwise travel by car, would take a high speed train instead.
- Because the trains are electric, they are likely to help reduce pollution.
The cons would be:
- We cannot know for sure how many people would take the high speed trains. Demand could not be high enough to justify the cost.
- The line would be very costly.
- It could end up benefit only a small section of the population who would take the trains, or who travel often.
I believe that the benefits outweigh the drawbacks, as can be seen in most countries where high speed lines have been made between large cities. For example, in Spain, the line between Madrid and Barcelona is profitable. The same would likely happen for a line between Los Angeles and San Francisco.
What are the implications of starting a project based on tenuous projections that may or may not come true 10 years from now?
If demand projections are tenous, there is always the possiblity that the high speed line could not be profitable. However, this risk can be lowered if the line is made between highly populated cities.
Could you justify the California high-speed rail project from the perspective of a massive public works initiative?
Yes, a high speed rail would be a project that could massively impact California. The benefits of its operation could outweight the cost.
In other words, what other factors enter into the decision of whether to pursue a high-speed rail project?
As I said before, the most important factor is to construct line between highly populated cities in order to reduce the risk of not having enough demand. It has been demonstrated around the world, in Spain, in Italy, in Japan, in China, that high speed lines that connect very populated regions, can be profitable.
