Answer:
there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that more than 10% of the employees are paid minimum wage.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that:
A marketing organization claims that more than 10% of its employees are paid minimum wage.
The null hypothesis is:

The alternative hypothesis is:

If a hypothesis test is performed that fails to reject the null hypothesis, how would this decision be interpreted
i.e Decision Rule: fails to reject the null hypothesis
Then the interpretation of the decision is that, there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that more than 10% of the employees are paid minimum wage.
Answer:
Complementary angles.
Step-by-step explanation:
Notice that
and
, by given.
, by sum of angles.
, by supplementary angles definition.

Which means,

Therefore,
, in other words, angles a and b are complementary by definition.
Answer:
B
Step-by-step explanation:
I have to do that exact same paper
Answer:
.
Step-by-step explanation:
0.85x + 375 > 450
Answer:
shheeeesh that is hard good luck