I'd use synthetic div. here, with 2 as my divisor:
________________
2 / 1 -11 18
2 -18
----------------------------
1 -9 0
Note that the coefficients of the missing factor are given here and are 1 and -9. Thus, (x-9) is the missing factor.
Sum/difference:
Let

This means that

Now, assume that
is rational. The sum/difference of two rational numbers is still rational (so 5-x is rational), and the division by 3 doesn't change this. So, you have that the square root of 8 equals a rational number, which is false. The mistake must have been supposing that
was rational, which proves that the sum/difference of the two given terms was irrational
Multiplication/division:
The logic is actually the same: if we multiply the two terms we get

if again we assume x to be rational, we have

But if x is rational, so is -x/15, and again we come to a contradiction: we have the square root of 8 on one side, which is irrational, and -x/15 on the other, which is rational. So, again, x must have been irrational. You can prove the same claim for the division in a totally similar fashion.
<span>Number
line is a way of expressing an integer into a line.
We have the given numbers:
Let x = -5
and Let y = 3
Now let’s create line with 0 in the center. Pls. see the attached image for the
number line presentation.
The answer is -2</span><span>
</span>
The sum of two and the quotient of a number x and fine.
sum= +
two= 2
quotient= divide
five= 5
2+ x/5 <- should look something like this
I hope this helps!
~kaikers
Answer:
I think it is b
Step-by-step explanation: