Answer: Option C
Explanation: Marketing uses inseparability to describe the main service value as distinct from goods. Inseparability is the feature of a service that makes it difficult to distinguish the service's supply or output from its utilization.
In the given case, the main objective of the consumer was to get her product but the service by the employee was also an inseparable part that affected the utility satisfaction of Wendy.
Hence we can conclude that the correct option is C.
I’m not too sure. That’s a good question
Answer:
All data are unknown with decision making under uncertainty.
Explanation:
There are various assumptions used by a LP allocation problem and they are; any return from an allocation is not dependent of other allocations; it is possible to compare returns from varying allocations; total returns equals the sum of all returns that all the activities yielded. The only option that is not an assumption used by a LP allocation problem is "All data are unknown with decision making under uncertainty."
According to Fiedler's contingency model of leadership, a leader's performance depends on their own styles and how much control and influence they have over the circumstance.
<h3>What is Fiedler's theory of contingent leadership?</h3>
According to Fiedler's Contingency Theory, a leader's leadership style needs to be appropriate for the circumstances in order to be effective. You can use this model to determine your own leadership style, evaluate the situation that calls for leadership, and assess whether you are the best candidate.
Consider a basketball team as a first example of using Fiedler's model, as they have a disciplined work, a low amount of power, and (in theory) good leader-member connections. Instead of a relationship-focused coach giving everyone an equal voice in this situation, you would want a task-oriented coach to define the game strategy.
<h3>What is suggested by Fielder's theory?</h3>
Most notably, Fiedler's theory contends that a leader's personality is not the sole factor in determining how effective they are. Instead, this situational theory contends that when people are in settings that support their particular leadership philosophies, they develop into supportive leaders.
Learn more about Fiedler's Contingency Theory: brainly.com/question/20709656
#SPJ1
Answer:Weak,Inductive,Uncogent
Explanation:This tries to compare Sierra Nevada mountain range and the island of Jamaica are both popular tourist destinations.
The conclusion made by this statement is WEAK, INDUCTIVE AND UNCOGENT.
The information about the bringing of Ski equipment when traveling to Jamaica in February is not a strong, deductive and cogent conclusion as both areas are not exactly the same as stated by the write up.
A conclusion is said to be weak when it does not have strong evidence to back it up,it is said to be inductive if it is not fully supported by the premise and it is said to be Uncogent when the argument is not clear and believable.