Answer:
1. It Is a clear expression of fake democracy. The term "free election" doesn't entirely make sense in a country where any distinction between the ruling party and the government has been almost completely erased. Syria is considered a unitary republic with a semi-presidential style of government. However, the controlling parties practice a highly authoritarian regime with most of the political power in the AL-Assad family's hands. People doesn't have more option if the want to "live".
2. If I live in that country, I think I feel like a hostage. Elections over there aren't free, and they're certainly not fair. The resulting optics are not democratic enough. They buy the government a minimum of democratic credibility abroad without seriously imperiling its hold on power.
Explanation:
Support your claim with solid evidence that is relevant to your topic. You should also include a counterclaim and rebuttal in your work to show the other side's opinion and show why it is wrong
The main reason people in other European countries resisted Napoleon because they didn't want him to take over their country and because of Napoleon's mistakes
Answer:
A. Relevant information
Explanation:
relevant means something that is related to the topic or issue
The imperial presidency is a fact where the abuse of a power by a president makes it seem like an autocratic rule.
Explanation:
Imperial presidency is something that has happened more often than not in the nation in the times of conflict.
The power of the president is risen up in the time of a war or a major crisis and they are ultimately responsible for a lot of informal decisions that are never taken to court for not following the producer of law as there is an innate understanding on it in the wings of the government.
There are times when it is simply more viable to let the President make the decisions without following protocols but it is a murky territory.
