This is not the reason why not support ethical relativism; Ethical
relativism holds that there is a right and wrong, even though we do not agree
about what is right and wrong and If people disagree about some moral matter,
their disagreement will always be due to their having different moral values.
Answer:
No, Jim is not correct.
Explanation:
Betty will win this case.
Generally, the law encourages marriage as its policy. If there is any contract that prevent or restrict marriage in whatever way, such contract would be considered null and void because it is against the public policy.
Despite the above, contracts will be generally considered valid when they place reasonable restrictions on marriage. In this question, the restriction placed on Betty that she should get married until after her 22nd birthday is reasonable and has to be considered to be valid. Based on this, Betty has to be paid the $25,000 as laid down in the binding contract between the two parties.
Therefore, Jim is not correct.
Answer:
Total deduction 2,443.21
Explanation:
8,288
x 6.20% Sccial Security 513.856
x 1.45% Medicate 120.176
x 6.20% FUTA&SUTA (for 7,000) 434
Income tax witheld 1,375.17
Total deduction 2,443.21
We will multiply his taxable wages for period by the tax rate.
We must noticew FUTA and SUTA applies fdor the first 7,000 only so we multiply by 7,000 not by 8,288
Answer:
C
Explanation:
This is an example of an externality, because the very existence of the building affects the cash flow for any new project that Rowell might consider.
Answer:
The correct answer is Supply Chain
Explanation:
TT toys have recently started buying paint from a Chinese company to complete the final product. The Chinese company is part of the supply chain because it is helping TT toys to complete the final product. The Chinese company is providing a resource, and any operation which acts as a source, resource, or information to complete a product is a part of a supply chain management.
