Answer:
I do not understand the question
Explanation:
B is likely the correct answer.
There are very few economists who advocate for the privatization of the military as the privatization of military has interesting efficiency and national security concerns. (Militaries in the hands of CEOs...)
Instead, many economists see the military as an example of the government providing for the protection of the collective common good and that it is most efficient and necessary for the government to provide this service.
Answer:
<em>Hi There the correct answer is A. Local Level.</em>
Explanation:
Because Before accepting or spending money related to campaigning for office, a candidate for state office must file a candidate intention statement with the California Secretary of State. Note that this requirement does not apply to candidates for congressional office; federal campaign finance requirements apply to candidates for federal office. Candidates may qualify to run for office either by paying a filing fee or by submitting a petition in lieu of the filing fee.
In addition to the candidate intention statement, a candidate is required to file nomination forms with his or her home county. These forms become available as early as the 113th day prior to the primary election and must be filed no later than the 88th day prior to the primary election.[8][9]
Nomination forms include a statement of economic interests, a declaration of candidacy, and nomination papers. Nomination papers require a certain number of signatures from registered voters. If a candidate qualifies by submitting an in-lieu-of-filing-fee petition, the signatures on that petition will be counted towards the requirement for the nomination paper. Registered voters may sign both the in-lieu-of-filing-fee petition and the nomination paper, unless the candidate is using the signatures on the in-lieu-of-filing-fee petition to count toward the nomination paper requirement. If that is the case, a registered voter can sign only one of the documents. Hope it helps!
Answer:
Burning of fossil fuels
Explanation:
Over the last 200 years, burning of fossil fuels has been the major source of carbon emission. Here, atmospheric concentrations of 12C, 13C, and 14C refers to the carbon isotopes (12C, 13C and 14C) and therefore the statement refers to carbon emissions. It is now no surprise that carbon concentrations in the atmosphere is responsible for the environmental changes and that fossil fuel burning is the reason behind increased atmospheric carbon concentrations as proven by scientific research.