<u>The federal government lagged behind the private sector in technological advancements because:</u>
- The federal government has made poor decisions in technology investments.
- The federal government has squandered hundreds of millions of dollars on costly IT projects.
Answer: Options A and D
<u>Explanation:</u>
The federal government invests hundreds of millions of dollars on costly IT projects and tops among organizations in the world. Now also the information exchanging form is out of date like mailing CDs, using outdated computer systems, etc but the government progressed in the 20th century by becoming both as benefactor and beneficiary of technology.
The major development of IBM hiked from government-led orders like the early mainframes during the Cold War was utilized by the defense department, the very first network resembling today’s Internet “ARPANET” funded by the defense department.
But the government also has been seen behaving sluggishly as said by the chairperson of the subcommittee on federal financial management named Sen.Thomas R. Carper who also conveyed that 100's of millions of dollars investment was poorly planned by federal government reasons were like inappropriate management of IT projects and followed IT investments which were photostat kind.
Judicial activism would make a justice more likely to alter acts of other branches of government
Judicial Activism :
Judicial activism interprets the Constitution to be in favor of contemporary values. In judicial activism, judges are able to use their powers as judges in order to correct a constitutional legal injustice. In the matter of judicial activism, the judges have a great role in creating social policies in many different areas, especially the protection of civil rights and rights of the individual and public morality. The goal of judicial activism is to create policy change when it is needed in certain circumstances.
What role should judicial philosophy play?
Judicial philosophy plays a vital role in deciding which judges are appointed to court systems. While few judges adhere to a particular philosophy 100-percent of the time, most possess an overall philosophy that is conservative, liberal, or moderate
Learn more about judicial philosophy :
brainly.com/question/20780922
#SPJ4
It's all about acceptance. Whether when they decide to come out of their closet, or they have already come out.
So for a society to accept such individuals, the society needs to be more liberal, open to new ideas and new methods.
Hope it helps you.
Please mark as the brainliest
Thank You
Christina Red
<span>A: Native American
HOPE THIS HELP</span>
