Hamlet’s advice to the Player is the right answer
Question Options:
A) cause of action for breach of implied covenant of good faith.
B) retaliation claim as a result of whistleblowing activities.
C) legitimate claim under bona fide occupational qualification (BFOQ).
D) disparate impact employment discrimination.
Answer: retaliation claim as a result of whistleblowing activities.
A retaliation claim involves an act whereby an employer treats an employee adversely when an employee alleges about any wrong, harassment or discrmination.
James was involved in whistleblowing which is the act whereby an individual passes information about a wrongdoing in an organisation. Based on this whistleblowing (reporting that particular batch of widgets did not meet the exacting requirements of the U.S) his boss demoted him( retaliation). Hence, James has a claim for retaliation.
<u>Answer:</u>
This statement is not true. It is a false statement because both these sub parts are not small or are not for kids. Both these are adults and are of legal age so they are not applied to juveniles.
Sub part C and D are found guilty of the crime that they have committed and are put behind the bars. They are imprisoned and not applied to juveniles for the modification in their behavior and to change them.
When there is a complete and nonacceptance policy for an activity, this is a zero-tolerance policy.
<h3>What is a zero-tolerance policy?</h3>
This refers to when an activity is completely prohibited by the body that enacted the policy.
A great example is a company's zero-tolerance policy for drinking alcohol at work. If an employee is found violating this policy, they could be terminated.
Find out more on zero-tolerance policies at brainly.com/question/10750693.
One reason is: the country would have really beautiful landscapes that people would be attracted too. Second reason: the country would have a really unique culture or cultural history that people would want to learn more or be also attracted too
Hope this helps
Have a happy holidays:)
