Answer:
Yes, there is evidence to support that claim that instructor 1 is more effective than instructor 2
Step-by-step explanation:
We can conduct a hypothesis test for the difference of 2 proportions. If there is no difference in instructor quality, then the difference in proportions will be zero. That makes the null hypothesis
H0: p1 - p2 = 0
The question is asking whether instructor 1 is more effective, so if he is, his proportion will be larger than instructor 2, so the difference would result in a positive number. This makes the alternate hypothesis
Ha: p1 - p2 > 0
This is a right tailed test (the > or < sign always point to the critical region like an arrowhead)
We will use a significance level of 95% to conduct our test. This makes the critical values for our test statistic: z > 1.645.
If our test statistic falls in this region, we will reject the null hypothesis.
<u>See the attached photo for the hypothesis test and conclusion</u>
Answer:
E (-2, 4).
Step-by-step explanation:
(x/2 + 1)(x/2 - 2) = 0
x/2 = -1, x/2 = 2
x = -2, 4.
The roots will be 2 times the roots of f(x).
The ratio is rational and by multiplying or dividing the numbers included in the ratio by the same number, it's just like taking a fraction and taking it out of simplest form, it doesn't change the value of the ratio or the fraction in simplest form, it just changes the numbers
This is considered a function because each input has a different output. For example, a certain x value doesnt equal 2 different y values, making this a function. Take this: if there is (2,4) and (3,4), this is a function because although the y values are the same, the x values are different. (2,3) and (2,4) do not convey a function because the x values are the same, but each has a different y value.
hope this helped!!!
brainliest answer, please?