Answer:
Reducing trade barriers
Explanation:
<u>If governments choose protectionism, they harm citizens who could benefit from the products, services or jobs offered by foreign companies.</u>
If, for example, the “A” government sets <em>tariffs to protect the domestic market</em>, the “B” government <em>could respond with tariffs in retaliation</em>, which would result in both countries being harmed. So, the problem of trade warfare is still represented by a “Prisoner's Dilemma” game because it says that two people, in this case, two governments, can decide not to cooperate even if it goes against the interest of both.
On the other hand, <em>unrestricted free trade could go against governments that develop trade policies based on national economic well-being.</em>
The game's equilibrium solution would be for both countries to opt to reduce their trade barriers through negotiations.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
You forgot to include the options for this question. However, we can answer the following.
Nozick’s Wilt Chamberlain example (updated by Professor Sandel to the Michael Jordan example) is supposed to illustrate that "liberty upsets patterns and, therefore, the entitlement conception of justice requires illegitimate restrictions of liberty. This applies to justice in holdings and justice in transfer.
American professor Robert Nozick, known for its interesting work at Harvard University, was a justice researcher and theorist who studied libertarian rights and the role of justice in modern society.
In 1974, he wrote the influential book called "Anarchy, State and Utopia," in which he defended the existence of a non-interventional state that granted liberties to citizens with minimal or none interference in the lives of people.
B. A long list of words is better remembered if the words are organized categorically.
Correct answer choice is:
B. a large cultural and historical display
Explanation:
A national campaign has been mounted to post the ten commandments publically in colleges, courthouses, and different public buildings. On Gregorian calendar month, twenty-one, 1999, the family analysis council associated over 36 members of Congress launched an initiative, referred to as the “Hang Ten” project, to show the Decalogue in legislature offices, public colleges, and different public buildings.The Supreme Court has ruled in the past on where the Ten Commandments can be displayed that will not violate the Constitution. One place where they can be displayed without violating the Constitution is a large cultural and historical display.
