The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was deemed unconstitutional because white settlers had revoked the constitution of the Cherokee nation in Georgia, stating that Native Americans were subject to Georgia's state laws, not their own.
The Cherokee nation argued that they were an independent, or sovereign nation, so they were not subject to the laws of the state of Georgia. The Supreme Court agreed, saying that Georgia had no authority over the Cherokee people, who were a sovereign nation. The Cherokee people could only be subject to the authority of the federal government, not state or local.
Even though the Indian Removal Act was deemed unconstitutional, President Jackson disagreed and continued the policy of relocating tribes, stating that they were voluntary. History has shown that, in fact, there were forced removals under this act.
Answer:
Likely due to confounding.
Explanation:
This outcome can most likely be explained as a consequence of confounding. Confounding refers to a distortion in the measure of association between two variables. This inaccuracy is the consequence of the variable of interest being mixed up with another factor that played a role in the result. In this example, this means that there might be another variable at play that causes this association between eating fruits and vegetables and the risk of developing colon cancer.
Answer:
In the Tenth Amendment, the Constitution also recognizes the powers of the state governments. Traditionally, these included the “police powers” of health, education, and welfare.
Answer:
When theres someone in my swamp
Explanation:
The correct answer is Bipolar Disorder.
Bipolar Disorder is was known before as Manic Depression. Bipolar Disorder is a psychological issue that causes times of sorrow and times of anomalous lifted disposition. The modified state of mind is huge and is known as lunacy or hypomania, contingent upon its seriousness, or whether side effects of psychosis are available.
