Answer:
A
Step-by-step explanation:
A linear function describes a straight line with constant gradient. Hence A is the answer as it has a constant gradient of -1 .
B is wrong as the graph has an undefined gradient.
C is wrong as it has an increasing gradient.
D is wrong as it does not have a constant gradient too.
Using transformations and congruency concepts, it is found that with these following transformations, the triangles will be congruent.
- A reflection, then a translation.
-
A rotation, then a reflection.
--------------------------
- Two triangles are congruent if they have the <u>same lengths</u> of the sides and the <u>same angles.</u>
- In a reflection, there is a rule that changes the <u>coordinates (x,y)</u>, but does <u>not </u>change <u>the lengths</u> of the sides of the triangles, thus they will still be congruent.
- A <u>reflection is also a special case of rotation</u>, thus, in a rotation, the triangles are also congruent.
- A translation is also similar to a reflection, using rules to shift the triangle up, down, left or right according to it's coordinates, not changing the sides or angles, thus congruent.
- In a dilation, the <u>lengths of the sides are changed</u>, thus, the triangles will not be congruent.
--------------------------
Thus, from the bullet points above, the correct options are:
- A reflection, then a translation.
- A rotation, then a reflection.
A similar problem is given at brainly.com/question/24267298
Answer: you didnt post graphs to look at
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
It is 4
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
the distance is -2
Step-by-step explanation:
because you subtract
