Answer: It's either G or H, but I wanna go with G!
Explanation:
Because the US was able to motivate it's public better with yellow journalism.
Answer:
The answer is A. Rebuttal.
Explanation:
Rebuttal consists of a kind of evidence that is usually utilized to contradict other evidence that was considered by an opposite party. This term is also used in aspects related to politics as well as public affairs.
In terms of law, there are special rules concerning rebuttal. Rebuttal evidence or rebuttal witnesses must be related to the appropriate subject concerning the evidence rebutted. If there is new evidence that has a relationship with other subjects, it cannot be admitted in rebuttal. However, a rebuttal is considered a way through which a party could introduce unexpected evidence as well as witnesses.
Answer:
an avoidance-avoidance
Explanation:
Avoidance-avoidance conflict: The term"avoidance-avoidance conflict" refers to the tendency of an individual to make a particular decision by choosing between two equally or similar undesirable choices.
Example of avoidance-avoidance conflict: A boy encountering avoidance-avoidance conflict would be involved in the procedure of choosing between one of the two tasks i.e, either to do his school assignment or to do any household work.
In the question above, the statement signifies the avoidance-avoidance conflict.
Explanation:
While technology, population, environment factors, and racial inequality can prompt social change, only when members of a society organize into social movements does true social change occur. The phrase social movements refers to collective activities designed to bring about or resist primary changes in an existing society or group.
Wherever they occur, social movements can dramatically shape the direction of society. When individuals and groups of people—civil rights activists and other visionaries, for instance—transcend traditional bounds, they may bring about major shifts in social policy and structures. Even when they prove initially unsuccessful, social movements do affect public opinion. In her day, people considered Margaret Sanger's efforts to make birth control available extreme and even immoral, yet today in the United States, one can easily purchase contraceptive products.
Social scientists interest themselves in why social movements emerge. Do feelings of discontent, desires for a “change of pace,” or even yearnings for “change for the sake of change” cause these shifts? Sociologists use two theories to explain why people mobilize for change: relative deprivation and resource mobilization.
