Answer:
Democracy is form of government in which the power is vested in the hands of the people. The people have the right to choose their governing legislature and they also have the power to change them. Democracy provides an environment that respects human rights and fundamental freedoms, and in which the freely expressed will of people is exercised.
Answer:
Mild threat reduced their dissonance by rating for the forbidden toy as less attractive than before
Explanation:
Dissonance: Dissonance theory was given by Leon Festinger. It is related to psychological or emotional distress due to overlapping some beliefs, ideas, and values. It is a clash between a person's beliefs and new information. People always seek stability in their current life and their expectation, it does not happen then the person feels discomfort internally. there are two factors determine the discomfort level of a person that is given
- The importance of the cognition
- The ratio of the cognition
Hello user
Answer: <span>Abolition and suffrage
Reason: Women at that time didn't have equal rights, and they were standing up for themselves with this slogan, saying that they are human too. Being discriminated against is a form of suffrage and abolition
I hope I helped
-Chris</span><span />
<u>Discretion</u> refers to the use of personal judgment by police officers, prosecutors, judges, and other criminal justice system officials regarding whether and how to proceed in a given situation.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Discretion is the use of personal judgement in criminal cases against offenders. Discretion is viewed as either positively or negatively in case of law. Discretion is practiced at all levels of jurisdiction.
For instance, a judge may use discretion to consider specific evidence or exclude it from trial. Likewise, the police have the power to enforce laws and in some cases are lenient enough to let an offender go. This is where discretion is considered to have a negative impact.
Answer:
D) The Soviet economy was a tremendous success story; the USSR would still be together if it were not for the ethnic differences.
Explanation:
The Soviet economy was not a tremendous success, in fact, it was in many aspects a failure (although it was a success in some fields).
The other 3, true statements in the question give us a clue why:
The Soviet system benefited the center (Russia) disproportionally, leaving aside the other, peripheral republics in Central Asia, the Caucasus, The Baltics, and Eastern Europe, which were often very poor.
The Soviet system used a planned economy, instead of a market economy, and this led to many errors in the production of goods and services. Resources were often poured in unprofitable industries over more profitable ones, and the geographical location of the economic sectors often did not make sense.
Things that in a market system would likely not happen, ocurred in the soviet planned economy because the planners did not realize their mistakes.
