False
his nickname was “the young Napoleon”
Answer:
Though it was considered the "Dark Ages", brave men and women laid the foundation for a better age.
Explanation:
The idea of the "Dark Ages" comes to us due to the bias of scholars. When the rediscovery of the ancient cultures of Greece and Rome began, people were fascinated by their knowledge and their advancements. They began to think of this age, and their own, as the periods of knowledge. The period in-between was labelled the "Middle Ages" and was considered a time of darkness, superstition, and ignorance. However, this is not an accurate description of the time. Despite its name, the "Dark Ages" was in fact a period of artistic and cultural development, and it laid the foundations for the future.
Answer:
On June 10,1940 US president Franklin D Roosevelt gave his famous speech "Stab in the Back" at University of Virginia.
On the speech He mentioned that the hand that held the dagger has struck into it's neighbor's back. Here he referred Italy and Mussolini as the hand which held dagger and France was the neighbor.
Because on June 10,1940 Italy declared war against France and Britain and joined to Germany on axis power. Mussolini said Italy was joining war against France and Britain as for keeping promise to Germany.
Roosevelt mentioned this incident for in his speech as the hand held dagger has struck into France's back.
Moreover, in this speech, He made a proclamation about removing America's neutral position in war and soon declared the Mediterranean see as a combat zone.
Explanation:
Answer:
They laid siege to the city for many days.
Explanation:
Once Grant arrived at his destination, he found the city too strong to assault, so he had his men build trenches and laid siege to the city.
The siege began in May of 1863 and lasted until July 4. With no hope of reinforcements, and his men starving, Confederate General John Pemberton finally surrendered the city.
Answer:
President Jimmy Carter authorized the deposed Shah of Iran to enter the United States for medical treatment — with catastrophic consequences. Carter blundered because of vacillation, shortsighted thinking, a disregard for identified risk and inept implementation that included zero precautions to protect against disaster.
As Trump charts a new course with one of the most powerful nations in the Middle East, Carter’s missteps offer him valuable lessons: When dealing with Iran, a president must verify that information is accurate, consider risks carefully and imagine how one’s own actions will be perceived by Iranians, who evaluate circumstances through an entirely different historical prism.
Like his predecessors, Carter considered Shah Mohammed Reza Pahlavi an ally and friend. In December 1977, he visited Tehran and toasted the shah for making Iran “an island of stability” and for “the admiration and love which your people give you.” It was a delusional toast, one that demonstrated a total lack of understanding of historical legacies and the political fires raging in Iran.
Power was slipping from the shah’s grasp thanks to a growing revolutionary movement inspired by Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini and nurtured by resistance to royal repression. This revolution reached a tipping point on Jan. 16, 1979, when security risks forced the shah to flee the country.
Explanation:
