Answer:
It is not always necessary to lie.
Explanation:
Lying is not "always" a necessity. Most times, people tell lies to get away from a situation: to deny allegations, to escape punishment or even to escape from shame of the moments. people that lie, if properly investigated, have something they are hiding or they usually have a bad situation (although not always) they want to get away from. This is why people lie. More so, some people also lie to cover their excesses or to gain advantage over a situation. This is the reason why when a person lies, he or she has broken the trust put in him or her by friends, family, colleagues and even bosses. So can we now say that, it is justifiable to break the heart of our loved ones because lie is a necessity? No! When a person is caught lying, trust goes out the window in most cases, and it has to be rebuilt again, all in the name of lie necessary.
From the situations stated above, it can therefore be concluded that, lying is not necessary if people are willing to face the consequence of their actions or if they can stand the shame of their actions also.
I believe the answer is: Role confusion
Identity vs role confusion occurs when and individual is at the period of time when he/she is trying to find what is the purpose of their life. People commonly reach this stage when we are transitioning from childhood (when our roles are fully determined by our parents) to adolescent.
Answer:
The answer is "expert".
Explanation:
The expert power would be a belief to everyone in the organization has quite a high degree of experience or unique knowledge. Its perception gives the specialist greater power.
- It is more essential than reward-based or oppressive control, as per managing teachers represent when efficiently by its leading people.
- When you know, your staff would probably be much more responsive to directing everyone, and it will find it a lot easier to motivate people to be doing what they can.
Yes, the crime still would have been committed. Falsification of documents and false representations are crimes, irrespective of their consequences.
However. If Mills had paid, Pivowar would never have come to know about the false representation and the case would not have come to court. Whether the case comes to the court or it does not, is an independent factor of whether a crime has been committed.
A crime is an offense punishable by state or other authority. The term crime does not have a simple, generally accepted definition in modern criminal law, but a statutory definition is provided for specific purposes.
Learn more about crime here:brainly.com/question/6203610
#SPJ4
