Answer:The French commentator on American society in the 1830s, Alexis de Toqueville, observed that Americans are very quick to join together to promote whatever causes they favor. There was certainly evidence around him. Reforms on many issues — temperance, abolition, prison reform, women's rights, missionary work in the West — fomented groups dedicated to social improvements.
During the 50s Martin Luther King Jr. was a fierce advocate for the rights of African Americans.
Rights which many believed were denied to them even after the tragic civil war an the poor reconstruction era.
In a response to a call for 'a policy of moderation' Marin Luther King Jr. said that if moderation meant that we should move forward with calm, restraint, non violence and reason, then he was all for a moderation.
However, if moderation meant that they should slow done their movement for justice, equality, rights and freedom of African Americans, then he could not accept a policy of moderation.
At the end, Martin Luther King Jr. believed in the right to ask for justice but without violence and restraint.
Answer:
The answer is D. They both used diplomatic ways to achieve freedom for their nation. Although Kenyatta was a little more extreme. They did not cast out the Europeans during their rule nor were Muslims. Through diplomacy and talks they became leaders in which American activists have taken into their influence.
They became drastically different culturally and geographically. As the colonies came up with traditions for self-government like the House of Burgesses and the Mayflower Compact, the colonies became like a separate entity. The British practiced salutary neglect, leaving the colonies alone for the most part, until 1754, the end of the French and Indian War. I hope this helped.
