1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vlad [161]
3 years ago
6

2 reasons that the british solders might have believed they were justfied when they fired on the boston colonists

History
2 answers:
marusya05 [52]3 years ago
7 0

One of the reason was that the British soldiers were only defending themselves.  People were become violent and had started throwing stones at them. The second reason would be they were their because they wanted to stop the people from making protest on the Townshend Acts



Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/6812847#readmore

Leno4ka [110]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

1. The victims were troublemakers

2. Britain had to protect its interests

Explanation:

The Boston Tea Party was a result if the revolution by the colonial workers to fight against their oppressive British master. By the tea party, Britain felt threatened and therefore, sought to increase its security. One of the aftermaths of the tea part was the strained relationships between the two sides - the British and American colonies. This resulted in a massacre by the British army. They had several reasons to carry out this act. First, they though the troublemakers should be dealt with decisively. Second, Britain felt that it had to protect its interests.

You might be interested in
What sparked the sepoy rebellion
Oduvanchick [21]
The immediate causes that led to the Revolt of 1857 are as Follows:

i) Discontent and resentment against British rule had been growing among the Indians for a long time. By AD 1857. the stage was set for a massive revolt. Only spark was needed to set the country ablaze spark was provided by the events at Kanpur.Lucknow and Central India.

(ii) The rumours of cartridges smeared with pig and cow Eat spread like wildfire. As the Hindus consider the cow sacred and the Muslims do pig's meat, both these communities blatant to harm their religion. This incident, popularly Greased Cartridges Incident, became the immediate cause of the revoIt.

iii) On 24th April. 1857. some soldiers stationed at Meerut also refused to use the cartridges. On 9th May. 1857. they were severely punished for this.This incident sparked off a general mutiny among the sepoys of Meerut. On 10th May 1857, these rebel soldiers killed their British officers. released their imprisoned comrades and hoisted the flag of revolt. This was the official beginning of the 'Great RevoIt'.

Hope this Helped
If you need more from this chapter ask questions I'll Try to answer. ^^
7 0
3 years ago
What city does muhammad conquer to start his islamic empire?
GuDViN [60]
<u><em>Prophet Muhammad Conquered "Al Madina Almonawara" And Spread Islam all over the city,from their came back to Makkah,To vanquish Qurysh,And to go hajj,And came back to Al Madina Almonawara.And he died their.</em></u>
<u><em>Good luck! </em></u>


8 0
2 years ago
How did the government try to manage the skyrocketing national debt in WWII
san4es73 [151]
<span>X by suspending income taxes</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
People who use labor unions believe that unions
jekas [21]

Answer:

The creation of labor unions was to fight the injustice of unions such as low pay, long hours, and poor work conditions. Many Americans at the time felt that these were necessary steps to fight the unfairness or to end it completely.

Hope this helps! :)

3 0
2 years ago
How were the sophists different from the other philosophers of ancient greece? explain ur answer
lilavasa [31]

Both sophists and philosophers were well trained and highly educated, but the main difference was that a sophist taught others and they got paid for that. It is said that their own wealth was their only goal.

Philosophers, such as Socrates, refused to get paid.

Throughout history, the sophists have had a reputation as professionally amoral, . They would help people to attain any goal,  regardless of what it was. They would take any case, promote any cause, and empower any person, if the money was right.

Philosophers, for the most part, have walked on the side of the angels. They may sometimes have had reputations as prolix and obscure, complex and abstract,  out of touch, but they have, for the most part, seemed to be purer souls in their focus and work.

In other words, the sophists were much more concerned about how than about why. The philosophers have always been more cautious.

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are some arguments for and against an absolute monarchy as proposed by Hobbes?
    10·1 answer
  • Why did the Dred Scott VS. Sandford decision anger Northerners?
    10·1 answer
  • 1. Identifying For what group was the colony of
    12·1 answer
  • What are the differences between a Spanish settlement and an English settlement
    7·1 answer
  • The main role of banks in the nation’s economy is to
    8·1 answer
  • Which law passed by congress resulted in the trail of tears
    12·2 answers
  • What did the bonus army demand from president herbert hoover?answers?
    14·2 answers
  • What was the demographic breakdown of social classes during<br> the 18th century?
    5·2 answers
  • Which of the following was the only country to prevent significant rebellions or revolts from occur in the early 19th century?
    13·1 answer
  • What type of bicycle is this?
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!