If the Arctic became completely ice-free and phytoplankton productivity levels were maintained, Arrigo and his colleagues calculated that the new carbon sink could in theory absorb an extra 160 million tonnes of carbon each year.
Answer:
-56.1kJ/mol
Explanation:
The reaction between HCl and NaOH is:
NaOH + HCl → NaCl + H₂O + ΔH
<em>Where ΔH is heat change in the reaction.</em>
<em />
As the temperature of the solution increases, the heat is released and ΔH < 0
The heat released in the reaction is obtained using coffe-cup calorimeter equation:
Q = C×m×ΔT
<em>Where Q is heat</em>
<em>C is specific heat of the solution (4.184J/g°C)</em>
<em>m is mass of solution: Assuming density = 1g/mL, 100mL of solution = 100g</em>
<em>And ΔT is change in temperature (13.4°C)</em>
<em />
Replacing:
Q = C×m×ΔT
Q = -4.184J/g°C×100g×13.4
Q = -5606.6J
Now, in the reaction you have:
<em>Moles HCl:</em>
0.050L * (2.2mol/L) = 0.11 moles
<em>Moles NaOH:</em>
0.050L * (2.0mol/L) = 0.1 moles
That means the moles of reaction are 0.1 moles, and heat change in the chemical reaction is:
5606.6J / 0.1 mol = 56066J =
<h3>-56.1kJ/mol</h3>
<em />
Answer:
The correct answer is: a. Southern California and Australia.
Explanation:
The solar power, in order to be more efficient and more productive, needs to be produced in places that have a lot of sunny days throughout the year. So the wisest and most practical thing to do is to install solar panels at places that are warm and sunny for most of the year. The southern part of California and most of Australia would be excellent choices for something like this. Both places have predominantly warm weather throughout the year, and more important, they have a lot of sunny days throughout the year. That provides the perfect conditions for harvesting the solar energy and use it as an energy source.
