It actually depends upon the type of government followed in the nation. If it's a democratic government then, no, the nations cannot avoid denying people their rights because the leaders are elected by the people & if they want to rule again then they have to listen to the people. But, if we are speaking about a monarchy or dictatorship then the monarch or dictator has every right not to listen to the people as they are the supreme leader of the country. This happens when a group of people overthrow the government as well (present day Taliban in Afghanistan is a good example).
_______
Hope it helps.
RainbowSalt2222
Answer:
The Alien and sedition acts gave the federal government effective authority yo stifle any public criticism, and were aggressively used by the Adams administration to that effect.
Explanation:
In 1798 president Adams responded to the French war threat by passing the Alien and Sedition acts, which prohibited any form of manifestation against the Federal government. This was done in order to secure the liberties of all Americans against any foreign threats. However, there was an internal tension which could escalate to civil war between the Federalists and the democrats, because the latter garnered non- native supporters. the Adams administration decided to take control and prohibit any form of public opposition to the federalist government in terms of internal and foreign policy or any other grievance.
I am a Muslim and I know that this is TRUE you can check if you don't trust me.
Answer:
The term "enlightened monarch" is a type of "absolute monarch". A "constitutional monarch" has many legal checks on their power. An "enlightened monarch" still has all of the power, but they voluntarily choose to use it in accordance with enlightened principals. they support the arts and education and social agenda.
Explanation:
