No x-intercept/zero
Step by step
To find x-intercept/zero, substitute f(x)=0
F(x)=-20
0=-20
The statement is false for any value of
X=0
Since there is no solution for f(x)=0, there is no -intercept/Zero
Your welcome:)
Answer:
https://campussuite-storage.s3.amazonaws.com/prod/735181/c9be791c-b8dc-11e6-bf0d-22000bd8490f/1815482/64a2070e-a58b-11e8-be02-0a844dce770e/file/Homework_Helper-Grade_5_Module_5.pdfStep-by-step explanation: sorry for the link but that should help
I think it’s pretty interpretative, the reason I didn’t divide 483/2 like you would normally with a triangle, is because there are 2 triangles in a trapezoid. Also you can split the two triangles off the trapezoid because in a trapezoid the train for will awkward be right.
Answer:
2.1x2.2= your answeer
Step-by-step explanation:
