The Supreme Court said Mr. Reynolds could not break the law while practicing his religion.
Reynolds v. the United States was heard by the Supreme Court in 1878 in regard the Morrill Anti-Bigamy Act placed on the Utah Territory.
Reynolds argued that preventing him to marry more than one woman was a violation of his First Amendment rights to protection of religion. The Supreme Court concluded that he had the right to his belief but he could not go around the law to practice his faith. The law stated marriage was to be between two people only and therefore he could not be married to more than one woman.
Answer: I believe they would have to A) amend the constitution
Explanation:
Since burning the flag isn’t based on state law, they would have to alter the constitution. Protesting won’t be effective and electing a president who supports it won’t guarantee anything.
The third amendment is known as a protection from intrusions or invasions. specifically the British had issues with their soldiers barging into homes and demanding hospitality and resources. This was known as the Quartering Act. The third amendment doesn’t allow soldiers to do this in America as a way to ensure privacy.
Answer:
D, The USSR used many Eastern European countries acquired from the end of WWII as sattelite countries, The USSR spread communism in places such as North Korea and China and the Marshall Plan saw to give aid to many of the countries affected by WWII in a Capitalist way which caused tensions with the USSR
The aftermath of World War II was the beginning of an era defined by the decline of the old great powers and the rise of two superpowers: the Soviet Union and the United States of America.
