1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Zarrin [17]
2 years ago
11

¿cómo se exige el derecho a la vida?

Law
1 answer:
AlexFokin [52]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

El derecho a la vida se exige constantemente, a través del propio ejercicio de este derecho. A su vez, el ejercicio del derecho a la vida como derecho natural inherente a todo ser humano se da a través del ejercicio de los otros dos derechos naturales fundamentales: la libertad y la búsqueda de la felicidad. Así, el derecho a la vida se exige viviendo plenamente, en libertad y buscando constantemente la felicidad propia y de nuestros seres queridos.

A su vez, el derecho a la vida también se exige incluyendo el respeto por este derecho en leyes fundamentales como constituciones nacionales y tratados de derechos humanos, que reconozcan este derecho como esencial a la condición humana.

You might be interested in
what is not considered a casualty event, regardless of whether a casualty loss or gain will be allowed?
S_A_V [24]

Answer:

Generally, you may deduct casualty and theft losses relating to your home, household items, and vehicles on your federal income tax return if the loss is caused by a federally declared disaster declared by the President. You may not deduct casualty and theft losses covered by insurance, unless you file a timely claim for reimbursement and you reduce the loss by the amount of any reimbursement or expected reimbursement.

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Must all elements of probable cause exist before a lawful arrest can be made?
kkurt [141]

householdThereWhichever,

Probable cause is a requirement found in the Fourth Amendment that must usually be met before the police make an arrest, conduct a search, or receive a warrant.

“Probable cause” is a legal standard applied to the police and prosecutors; individual citizens don’t “get” probable cause.

Police must demonstrate sufficient probable cause to believe that there is evidence of a crime to obtain a search warrant or an arrest warrant.

Prosecutors must demonstrate sufficient probable cause as to every element of a charged crime to proceed with filing charges and beginning the trial process.

There is no clear legal definition of what constitutes “probable cause” — it’s somewhere between suspicion and proof. The closest you’ll come is the 1949 case Brinegar v. the United States in which the Supreme Court described it thus:

“…where the facts and circumstances within the officers' knowledge, and of which they have reasonably trustworthy information, are sufficient in themselves to warrant a belief by a man of reasonable caution that a crime is being committed.”

Please imagine a situation when someone very healthy falls ill all of a sudden and the reason is not immediately known. You take that person to a doctor and the doctor will ask you to identify the root cause of the illness, generally as under:

type of food the person ate recently

what liquids he/she consumed

whether he/she traveled recently and had food from outside,

whether affected by climate change,

whether any drastic change in his/her daily routine etc.

any other likely change in his/her work schedule

The above list could be the probable causes from which the doctor can identify the root cause for the illness.

II. Similarly, when an inexplicable accident happens(the driver cannot find out the cause), several questions like the following may be asked:

was there break failure

did one of the tires burst

was the driver distracted by someone(suddenly crossing the road etc.)

did the driver doze off(sleep for a while)

The above can be considered as the probable causes, to arrive at the root cause of the accident.

This is cause and this is the effect is a highly scientific approach and it is hardly possible in less than 1% of our day-to-day life despite our 99% dependence on only science-originated things. It is a decision without measurements, proper logic errors, etc., we are forced to land in probability and possibility. Maximum experience is in medical decisions, especially in new upcoming nuisance topics like a corona. Only probable cause is guessed. There is nothing when a patient comes with corona. Whichever is the cause treat him with your best tools as a doctor? Those who work in huge projects of prevention, curtailing, “stop-the-spread” projects will break their heads.

A simple example from a household happening. The jewel kept on a chair just temporarily is missing. 1. Somebody should have kept it safely 2. Somebody should have pocketed it on a non-returnable basis 3. The servants should have taken full benefit of our negligence and we should start searching for what more is stolen 4. The jeweler whom we told that we have some repair work should have come and taken it for repair, we telephone and find out. 5. Government announced gold control when Morarji was P.M. Some excise officer should have read it now, noticed our careless and taken it.

Which out of these is most probable?

Nothing! The jewel was under the cushion of the chair.

Two servants were dismissed forever. There is no excise department connection with that jewel. Nobody can keep it more safely than what the jewel can keep its good self. That jeweler has left the city two years ago.

All guesswork done is included in only probable causes, many cause foolish. Some are probable. But the actual happening has not chosen that. It is the house that has chosen those causes. The scientific or guess ability of the house is clear to them at least.

Probable cause is a guesswork cause that may be or may not be tallying with the truth. The correct guess is 100% probable!

The jewel missing cause is 0% probable!

6 0
2 years ago
In criminal trials, the defense calls its witnesses first.<br> True<br> False
34kurt

Answer:

False.

The defense <em>does not</em><em> </em>call its witnesses first.

<em>I hope this helped at all.</em>

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
¿
Paraphin [41]

Answer:

necesitas

Explanation:

necesitas tú algo de la tienda?

me parece que es la respuesta indicada

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Ozzy recently started working at a new company. He has been solicited several times to join the union of the company, but he wou
Ne4ueva [31]

Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:

Ozzy recently started working at a new company. He has been solicited several times to join the union of the company, but he would prefer not to. The union officials tell Ozzy that he won’t be allowed to keep working unless he joins the union. Which of the following is true?

-The union officials are pretending they have a closed shop and can't influence Ozzy's decision.  

-The union can't make Ozzy join the union, but it can require him to pay union dues.  

-Ozzy must now join the union because union shops are always legal.  

-Ozzy's requirement to join the union depends on his state of employment.

Answer:

-The union can't make Ozzy join the union, but it can require him to pay union dues.  

Explanation:

There is a law called the National Labor Relations Act that states that no employee should be required to be part of the union and that membership in the union should not be placed as a requirement for the occupation of a particular labor function. However, some states and some companies may adopt different approaches to their employees and the union.

 In some states in the country, although an employee is not required to become a member of a union, they allow an obligation for all employees to be required to pay at least part of the union's dues. In this case, we can say that in relation to the case shown in the question above, the union can't make Ozzy join the union, but it can require him to pay union dues.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was partly responsible for the trials of alger hiss and the rosenbergs?
    8·1 answer
  • People who blame others or events beyond their control when something goes wrong are said to have a(n) A) authoritarian leadersh
    12·1 answer
  • This quotation represents a major principle of us foreign policy known as _______
    12·1 answer
  • What is the stair tool in investigation​
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following was a standard regulated by the Federal Bureau of Prisons
    14·2 answers
  • In your own point of view,what should be the key or the best way that the employer must do to avoid violations of labor and empl
    12·1 answer
  • Principle that only parties to the contract can take action against each other is called ………………………………. of contract.​
    10·1 answer
  • How are congressional districts determined
    10·1 answer
  • Differentiate stare decisis from Eminent Domain
    11·1 answer
  • Người vi phạm hành chính thì bị xử lý hành chính đúng hay sai tại sao
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!