Answer:
a. In consideration for her one-half interest in their personal residence, Kirby will transfer to Nell stock with a value of $200,000 and $50,000 of cash. Kirby's cost of the stock was $150,000, and the value of the personal residence is $500,000. They purchased the residence three years ago for $300,000.
Nell's basis for the stock is <u>$150,000</u>
Kirby's basis in the house is <u>$300,000</u>
The transfer of property due to divorce is nontaxable. The $50,000 that Nell receives is generally considered alimony (for tax purposes).
b. Nell will receive $1,000 per month for 120 months. If she dies before receiving all 120 payments, the remaining payments will be made to her estate.
The payments <u>NOT QUALIFY</u> as alimony and are <u>EXCLUDED FROM</u> Nell's gross income as they are received.
The TC&JA changed alimony rules and made them not deductible for the spouse that gives it, and not taxable for the spouse that receives it. It now works in a similar manner than child support. It doesn't make any difference now if payments are alimony or not.
c. Nell is to have custody of their 12-year-old son, Bobby. She is to receive $1,200 per month until Bobby (1) dies or (2) attains age 21 (whichever occurs first). After either of these events occurs, Nell will receive only $300 per month for the remainder of her life.
<u>$300</u> per month is alimony that is <u>EXCLUDED FROM</u> Nell's gross income, and the remaining <u>$900</u> per month is considered <u>CHILD SUPPORT</u> and is <u>NONTAXABLE</u> to Nell.
Again, the TC&JA changed the rules, so alimony received is not taxable.