Answer:
2 cents
Explanation:
The spot price = $0.7000 = 70 cents, The forward rate = $0.6950 = 69.5 cents and the call option with striking price = $0.6800 = 68.00 cents
The annualized six month rate = 3 1/2 % = 3.5 %, therefore the rate = r/n, where n is the number of period per year = 2. Therefore r/n = 3.5% / 2 = 0.035 / 2 = 0.0175
The minimum price = Maximum (spot price - striking price, (forward rate - striking price) / (1 + 0.0175), 0) = Maximum(70 - 68, (69.5 - 68)/ 0.0175, 0)
Minimum price = Maximum (2 , 1.47, 0) = 2 cents
Franklin Roosevelt's economic plans were to help the people by giving them things such as social security, lowering poverty rates, increasing wages and similar, while Ronald Regan's plan was to reduce tax rates so as to increase production and the overall wealth of the people. From this we might conclude that while Roosevelt wanted to help prevent poverty and help the people by through direct means, Regan wanted to help people by helping their employers who would in turn help their employees due to accumulated wealth.
Answer:
b. location clustering near high traffic flows
Explanation:
Proximity to customers is a major consideration when deciding on a business location. A business situated in areas with many potential customers has a high probability of succeeding. Restaurants are usually strategically situated in places with heavy customer flow.
Restaurants may be established near offices, in market places, near public transport terminus, or other location convenient to customers. With time, customers tend to associate that particular building, area, or street with restaurants. As the area becomes synonymous with restaurants, more customers will visit it, leading to more restaurants to open in that locality.
CVP analysis is more difficult because its requires costs to be broken down between variable and fixed which is not done in absorption costing.
<h3>What is a
CVP analysis?</h3>
This is an analysis that find out how changes in the firm's variable and fixed costs affect the firm's profit.
Hence, the analysis is difficult when using absorption costing than when using variable costing because its requires costs to be broken down between variable and fixed which is not done in absorption costing.
Read more about CVP analysis
<em>brainly.com/question/26654564</em>
