1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ludmilkaskok [199]
4 years ago
9

Find the accumulated value of $2,480 at the end of twelve years if the nominal interest rate was 2% convertible monthly for the

first three years, the nominal rate of discount was 3% convertible semiannually for the next two years, the nominal rate of interest was 4.2% convertible once every two years for the next four years, and the annual effective rate of discount was .058 for the last three years.
Business
1 answer:
dusya [7]4 years ago
6 0
In order to properly tackle this problem, we must understand the relationship between the nominal annual rate and real (effective) annual rate. 

To do this:
  -First you take the nominal rate, divide by the number of times it's compounded (converted) per year.
   -Then, add one to that number, and raise that number to the power of how many times you compound per year.

Here is the method in practice:
First 3 Years: 
Nominal rate= 2% ÷ 12 times/yr = 0.001667
Effective rate = 1.001667 ^12 = 1.020184

Next 2 Years (Discounting)
3% ÷ 2/yr = .015
1.015 ^ 2 = 1.061364

Next 4 years (Interest)
.042 ÷ .5 (once every 2 years) = .084
1.084 ^ (1/2) = 1.041153

The last 3 years are already expressed as an effective rate, so we don't need to convert them. The annual rate is:
1.058

I kept the 1 in the numbers (1.058 instead of 5.8% for example) so that it's easier to find the final number

Take every relevant number and raise it to the power of the number of years it's compounded for. For discounting, raise it to a negative power.
First 3 years: 1.020184 ^ 3 = 1.061784
Next 2 years: 1.030225 ^ -2 = .942184
Next 4 years: 1.041163 ^ 4 = 1.175056
Last 3 years: 1.058 ^ -3 = .84439

Multiply these numbers (include all decimals when you do this calculation)
1.062 * .942 * 1.175 * .844 = .992598

This is our final multiplier to find the effect on our principal:
.992598 * 2,480 = 2461.64

Answer is 2461.64
You might be interested in
True or false: Subsection (d) under section 10 of the Federal Arbitration Act requires the court to review the merits of every c
Vanyuwa [196]

It is a  <u>False </u>statment to say that subsection (D) of section 10 of the Federal Arbitration Act mandate that the court review the merits of every construction of a contract. The act speaks to Arbitration.

<h3>What does the Federal Arbitration Act of the United States of America say?</h3>

Subsection (D) of section 10 of the above stated Act state that the United States Court would vacate an award upon application by any of the party to the arbitration:

<em>Where the arbitrators exceeded their power or so imperfectly executed them that a mutual, final and definite award upon the subject matter submitted was not made.</em>

See the link below for more about Arbitration:

brainly.com/question/1139969

5 0
2 years ago
The weighted moving average forecast for the fifth period, with weights of 0.15 for period 1, 0.20 for period 2, 0.25 for period
bulgar [2K]

Answer:

a. 3,760

Explanation:

The computation is shown below:

Period     Demand    Weight    Demand × weight

1               3,500         0.15        525

2              3,800         0.20        760

3              3,500         0.25        875

4              4,000         0.40        1,600

Total                                          3,760                      

We simply multiplied the demand with the weight to get the total.        

4 0
3 years ago
Peak Performance Sporting Goods Company continues to perform well in spite of an economic recession. Company executives credit t
SVETLANKA909090 [29]
Answer is 2,000,000 . I need to add a little more sorry for this sentence
3 0
3 years ago
New brands with a small market share tend to spend proportionately more for advertising and sales promotion than those with a la
mestny [16]

Answer:

b. New brands require higher spending to reach a minimum level of exposure needed to affect purchase habits

Explanation:

New brands with a small market share tend to spend proportionately more for advertising and sales promotion than those with a large market share because a certain minimum level of exposure is needed to measurably affect purchase habits.

3 0
3 years ago
I just need help understanding how to work through this
gogolik [260]

Tough.. Just write a little stick figure guy saying I dunno. :) Hope I helped!

7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • HELP ASAP!! What process includes sending rough drafts to the client for approval?
    14·1 answer
  • Is producer surplus and economic profit the same thing?
    13·1 answer
  • Third parties suffering from the effects of factory pollution is an example of.....
    5·2 answers
  • The vigor of IPR protection is highly related to a country's stage of ________.A) economic developmentB) cultural heterogeneityC
    10·1 answer
  • Economic analysis is used only by policy makers to make policy decisions. only by business people to raise profits. only by inst
    6·1 answer
  • Mitch is the owner of GameOn, a popular sports bar. He personally trains his servers and then gives them autonomy to make on-the
    5·1 answer
  • An annual has 15 years to maturity. It has a coupon rate of 5%, a YTM of 8%. Fill in the cells highlighted in yellow, and aswer
    13·1 answer
  • Maud, a calendar year taxpayer, is the owner of a sole proprietorship that uses the cash method. On February 1, 2019, she leases
    11·1 answer
  • Advertising department expenses of $26,700 and purchasing department expenses of $46,700 of Cozy Bookstore are allocated to oper
    7·1 answer
  • PLEASE ive been asking for days i need help with this i don't understand it
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!