Obtuse triangle if that’s what you’re asking
Answer:
NO IT IS NOT
Step-by-step explanation:
16 1/2 = 16.5 1/28 = 0.0357
NOT THE SAME!!!!!
Please mark brainiest if this is helpful! :D
If f(x) is = to 0 then that means that you would have to plug the 0 in for all of the x that are in the function and the solve it.
f(x)= x3-4x-1
f(0)= (0)3-4(0)-1
0 0 0 -1
-1
so that means that -1 would be the answer for the function
Answer:
The integers are "closed" under addition, multiplication and subtraction, ... The rational numbers are "closed" under addition, subtraction, and multiplication
Step-by-step explanation:
It depends on what you mean by the delimiting carats "^"...
Since you use parentheses appropriately in the answer choices, I'm going to go out on a limb here and assume something like "^x^" stands for

.
In that case, you want to find the antiderivative,

Complete the square in the denominator:

Now substitute

, so that

. Then

which simplifies to

Now, recall that

. But we want the substitution we made to be reversible, so that

which implies that

. (This is the range of the inverse sine function.)
Under these conditions, we have

, which lets us reduce

. Finally,

and back-substituting to get this in terms of

yields