The two scholars contended that human behavior is not consistent as laymen and professional psychologists views it. They argued that research shows that behavior is not consistent. This inconsistency according to them is consistent and therefore can be used to predict human behavior.
Mate, your answer would be <span>eclectic therapy.
</span>
Answer:
1.In October of 1765, delegates from 9 colonies met to issue petitions to the British Government denying Parliament's authority to tax the colonies. ...
2.On the verge of the American Revolution, Committees of Correspondence were formed in cities and regions throughout the American colonies. ...
3.Instead of levying a duty on trade goods, the Stamp Act imposed a direct tax on the colonists.
4.
1 Throw the current policy, legal and institutional frameworks for combating corruption into the dustbin. They are ill conceived and cannot achieve their intended or presumptive goal(s).
2 Rethink the Ndegwa Report’s recommendation that allowed civil, public and state officers to engage in private business. The fight against corruption shall never get anywhere so long as we allow this conflict of interest.
3 Constitute a multi-disciplinary think tank, comprising intellectuals and practitioners from various fields, to formulate new policy, legal and institutional frameworks for combating corruption. The think-tank should be wary of an ultra-legal, linear or single-dimension approach to corruption.
4 Grant unconditional amnesty to all corrupt acts and omissions from the colonial days to date. The corrupt are too entrenched, having enjoyed unhindered access to state patronage since the colonial days. Any attempt to fight past corruption will never get anywhere. They will easily overrun the best professional teams from our State Law Office, the Police Service and the DPP. In other words, fight corruption prospectively, with effect from the date of the new policy, legal and institutional frameworks set out in
People who live in America can simply call themselves American now, as opposed to earlier when the area was divided into various countries.
<u>Explanation: </u>
This fact is the best out of the options that fits the description of the singular fact that best supports thee claim of modern life being less violent as compared to more and more of our evolutionary past.
This fact states that the people who were earlier divided into the countries and lived in a constant state of war, are now able to live together in a peaceful manner, thus stepping up from their evolutionary past and becoming less violent as they step into an era of modernization.
