Answer:
-13,-7,-3,0,3
-9,-4,-6,3,8
Step-by-step explanation:
So the first one would be 171/50 and the second would be -7/20
Answer:
the probability the car was actually blue as claimed by the witness is 33.33%. This is a low percentage and thus, there is a reasonable doubt about the guilt of the client.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given;
P(car is blue) = 1% = 0.01
P(car is green) = 99% = 0.99
P(witness said blue | car is blue) = 99% = 0.99
P(witness said blue | car is green) = 2% = 0.02
We will solve this by using Bayes’ formula for inverting conditional probabilities:
Thus;
P(car is blue | witness said blue) =
[P(witness said blue | car is blue) × P(car is blue)] / [(P(witness said blue | car is blue) × P(car is blue)) + (P(witness said blue | car is green) × P(car is green))]
Plugging in the relevant values gives;
(0.99 × 0.01)/((0.99 × 0.01) + (0.02 × 0.99)) = 0.3333
Thus, the probability the car was actually blue as claimed by the witness is 0.3333 or 33.33%
Straight line because it’s 180 degrees.
Answer:
±square root 20
Step-by-step explanation:
x²= 20
x= square root 20
x= 2 square root 5
x≈ 4.4721
