Different parallelograms require different ways of solving so theorems tell you how each parallelogram can be solved
Don’t listen to the people who give you the links
The answer is D I think. I'm not really good with math oof
Explanation:
A logarithm in one base is a constant multiple of a logarithm in any other base. Any "order of ..." specification does not include the applicable constant multiplier or the smaller order terms that may be required for an exact computation.
The concept of "order of" is similar to the concept of the degree of a polynomial. Knowing the degree of a polynomial tells you something about the "end behavior" as the function argument gets large. The specifics of the scale factor and lower-degree terms become largely irrelevant.
Answer:
Subtracting 7
Step-by-step explanation:
<u><em>Given:</em></u>
<em>Clara is stacking cups; she put 45 plastic cups in the first stack, 38 plastic cups in the second stack, 31 plastic cups in the third stack, and 24 plastic cups in the fourth stack. </em>
<u><em>To Find:</em></u>
<em>What kind of sequence is this?</em>
<u><em>Solve:</em></u>
<em>Let's make a table:</em>
<em />
<em>[1 stack] 45 </em>
<em>[2 stack] 38</em>
<em>[3 stack] 31</em>
<em>[4 stack] 24</em>
<em />
<em>Now all we have to do is subtract to see what each is:</em>
<em>45 - 38 = 7</em>
<em>38 - 31 = 7</em>
<em>31 - 24 = 7</em>
<em>Thus,</em>
<em>[1 stack] 45 ⇒ 7</em>
<em>[2 stack] 38 ⇒ 7 </em>
<em>[3 stack] 31 ⇒ 7 </em>
<em>[4 stack] 24 ⇒ 7 </em>
<em>Hence, each stack is going down by 7.</em>
<em />
<u><em>Kavinsky</em></u>
<em />