Dual consciousness is a contemporary example of which sociological concept developed at the turn of the twentieth century.
<h3>What does dual consciousness mean in sociology?</h3>
Dual consciousness is a situation in which an individual holds two contradictory sets of beliefs at the same time.
For example, the working-class may hold a set of beliefs derived from the education system that contrasts with a set of values acquired from the workplace.
<h3 /><h3>What are the three elements of double consciousness?</h3>
In this short but significant paragraph Du Bois poses three elements to the theory of Double Consciousness: the veil, twoness, and second sight.
Learn more about double consciousness here:
<h3>
brainly.com/question/14864729</h3><h3 /><h3>#SPJ4</h3>
During the international coronavirus pandemic, many people began acting aggressively toward individuals of Chinese descent, blaming them for the virus even though most of those people had lived in the United States for their entire lives. Those Chinese-Americans were the victim of a process called scapegoating.
What is the definition for scapegoating?
A person or group designated to take the blame for or endure suffering for others. Primarily biblical On Yom Kippur, a goat was released into the wilderness after the high priest figuratively placed the sins of the people upon its head.
What causes scapegoating?
Scapegoats may experience a range of unfavorable effects, such as a decline in social status, financial difficulties, social isolation, and depression. When under pressure, feeling oppressed, or feeling terrified, people are more likely to use scapegoating.
Learn more about scapegoating: brainly.com/question/21410298
#SPJ4
Answer:
how is nepotism tendency a corruption
B. Canadian government provides healthcare to its citizens
This question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is the following?
When the influence of the situation is _______, the consequent behavior is more likely to be a result of _______.
Select one:
a. weak; individual personalities
b. weak; external circumstances
c. strong; internal forces
d. strong; dispositions
Answer:
The correct option is letter A. When the influence of the situation is weak, the consequent behavior is more likely to be a result of individual personalities.
Explanation:
Since behavior is a product of a situation combined with the person, it is fair to think that the result may be accounted for differently according to how strong each element is. Thus, if a situation and the "sub-elements" it includes - such as the presence of others, cultural and social influences, and so on - are weak, it is only logic to assume that the element "person" will be predominant. The result behavior is, therefore, more likely to be a consequence of that individual's personality.