1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
satela [25.4K]
3 years ago
14

Was andrew jackson hero or villainessay about

History
1 answer:
vodomira [7]3 years ago
8 0
Who really was Andrew Jackson? Most people know that he was a United States president and a war commander. However, he was much more than that. He was a self-made man that didn't come from money or power. He was a major slave owner. Also, he and his brothers were in poverty when they were younger. He was a lawyer in Nashville, Tennessee. Jackson made inadequate choices during his presidency. In my opinion, Andrew Jackson was a far bigger hero than a villain.<span>
</span>
You might be interested in
Enslaved people who were house workers often
frutty [35]
Took care of children
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A republic is a government in which (4 points)
borishaifa [10]

Answer:

citizens elect others to make decisions

5 0
3 years ago
When the empire of rome was destroyed, why did the eastern half of the empire (byzantine) survive? answers for dummies?
yan [13]
<span> It survived the </span>fragmentation and fall of the Western Roman Empire<span> in the 5th century AD and continued to exist for an additional thousand years until it fell to the </span>Ottoman Turks in 1453. But why did it survive? <span>The eastern half of the Roman Empire was far less vulnerable to external attack, due to its geographic location. With Constantinople located on a strait, it was extremely difficult to breach the capital’s defenses; also, the eastern empire had a much shorter common frontier with Europe. It also benefited greatly from a stronger administrative center and internal political stability, as well as great wealth. The eastern emperors were able to exert more control over the empire’s economic resources and more effectively muster sufficient manpower to combat invasion. </span>
4 0
3 years ago
As Kiev increased its trade and contacts around the region, the most significant result was that
Hunter-Best [27]
Since you provide no options,

The most significant result probably that Kiev was able to increase its wealth

After Kiev increased its trade around that region , they're able to buy more manpower and equipments that would help them in their cause
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
He united states is not a member of the ________.
lesantik [10]
Hi there! The answer is A.

The united states is not a member of the Warsaw pact. The Warsaw pact was a treaty among the Soviet Union and seven of it satellite states in Eastern Europe. The US didn't participate in this treaty because they did not support communism.
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What did the british government do with the fort at louisbourg?
    14·2 answers
  • How did Stone Age people use technology to adapt and survive?
    7·1 answer
  • The declaration of sentiments helped the woman’s movement by demanding...
    5·1 answer
  • What is one direct result of competition in a free-market economy
    6·1 answer
  • U.S. involvement in WWII. Events need to be either concerning the Pacific against Japan
    14·1 answer
  • What two-word phrase, near the end of the second paragraph, does the author of the Declaration use to describe the condition the
    12·1 answer
  • Who are the empire builders described in the passage
    9·1 answer
  • (HELLUVA BOSS) Where is my Blitzy?
    8·2 answers
  • Where did the capital move to during the decline of rome?
    11·1 answer
  • Identify four common characteristics of genocides that have taken place in the 20th century. I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST TO THE RIGHT
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!