The answer id C I hope this help you
As someone working on deliberative democracy and its practices, I think we should not exaggerate electoral accountability. Of course it is better than nothing however it is not an effective way of ensuring a democratic system. At the end of the day, we are talking about a power that can be used every 4 or 5 years. Such power is simply not powerful. The lack of citizen power in politics is a systemic issue. Unless the ideas and perspectives of citizens are transmitted to the political arena, we cannot talk about the power of people.
Education is crucially important. With better education people's voting preferences might have better bases. However, this does not make the system any more democratic than it is now unless people have more chances of effecting the policy making. This needs a better systemic environment than electoral politics. Here, I think deliberative and participatory models offer great ways of political decision-making.
<h3>hope it's help you </h3><h3>plz mark as brain list ........!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</h3>
Answer:
Power sharing is essential as it helps to reduce the load and stress on one party.
Explanation:
- Power-sharing is an important aspect of the distribution of power and includes decentralization. That is from the authorities level to the local levels. Such as the hierarchy in an organization, power is shared within various vertical and horizontal levels.
Answer:
ether a or b but i think it is most likely to be a
The correct answer is Each of the above actions is consistent with social responsibility and none are necessarily inconsistent with stockholder wealth maximization.
Social responsibility is when companies voluntarily adopt attitudes, behaviors and actions that promote the well-being of their internal and external audiences. It is a voluntary practice as it should not be confused exclusively by compulsory actions imposed by the government or by any external incentives (such as taxes, for example). The concept, in this view, involves the benefit of the community, whether it is related to the internal public (employees, shareholders, etc.) or external actors (community, partners, environment, etc.).
Over time, this conception has given rise to some variations or nuances. Thus, new concepts - often complementary, distinct or redundant - are used to define social responsibility, including Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Social Responsibility.
