They had religous and chruch power also their duties to lead the chruch and be preist.
The given statement is true.
<h3>What is English-language legislation?</h3>
The English Language Unity Act existed first introduced in 2005. It hoped to designate English as the official language of the federal government of the United States. If enacted it would need that all official procedures and proceedings of federal and state government be conducted in English.
The English-only movement also understood as the Official English movement, exists as a political movement that advocates for the usage of only the English language in official United States government functions through the establishment of English as the only official language in the United States. Although more than half the states in America have enacted English-language legislation, it has been especially a symbolic gesture because our constitution does not stipulate a national language and congress has not established one either.
To learn more about English-language legislation refer to:
brainly.com/question/15984458
#SPJ4
Answer:
Higher levels of education increase the chance an unemployed person will get paid more money and reduce the time required to find new employment.
Explanation:
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": Binocular disparity.
Explanation:
Binocular disparity refers to the slight difference in the caption of an image between the left and the right eye because of the eyes' horizontal separation -also known as parallax.
In the case, Akeelah extended an arm and then one finger of the same arm. After focusing on the finger, she closes and opens both her left and right eye. As a result, she perceives a little different between the sight of one eye and the other.
Answer:
Common
Explanation:
Common law is a set of laws established by judicial authorities based on past events. These are informal unwritten laws that courts are allowed to use if similar case arises. So decision can be taken based on precedent.
This is used if existing written laws are not enough to decide the fate of a case. It is at the discretion of the judge to interpret the precedent and apply in the current situation.
