Answer:
These triangles cannot be proven congruent.
They are similar but NOT congruent.
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Because 
is being multiplied by S, we can divide from both sides of the equation. This will give us:
÷
But, that looks a bit hectic. Instead of dividing, you can multiply by the reciprocal (which is essentially how to divide fractions). So, instead of ÷, you get:
×
When multiplying fractions, remember you can just multiply straight across-- numerator x numerator, then denominator x denominator.
By doing that, you get the fraction
cannot be simplified any more, so S= is your answer :)
I hope this helps
Answer:
x = 3, y = - 2
Step-by-step explanation:
By substitution method,
4x + y = 10 -------> equation 1.
7x + 2y = 17 -------> equation 2.
From equation 1,
y = 10 - 4x ------> equation 3.
Substitute equation 3 in 2,
7x + 2 ( 10 - 4x ) = 17
7x + 20 - 8x = 17
7x - 8x = 17 - 20
- x = - 3
x = 3
Substitute x = 3 in equation 1,
4 ( 3 ) + y = 10
12 + y = 10
y = 10 - 12
y = - 2
Hence,
x = 3
y = - 2
The answer to the question is the second option.
