We cannot agree with Danika. Why? Well, The reasoning is given as follows:
Two functions are inverses of each other if and only if it is true that the composition function is given by:

Everything is ok up to this point, right?. But let's prove that this is not fulfilled for these functions, then:

<span>
As you can see we did not obtain the function that matches the definition of </span>inverse functions. For that reason <em>we can't agree with Danika</em>.
The formula for fractional exponents is
For this particular problem the expression would be written as
Answer:
prime factorization of 28
28 = 2 × 2 × 7
prime factorization of 50
50 = 2 × 5 × 5
Step-by-step explanation:
GCF, multiply all the prime factors common to both numbers:
Therefore, GCF = 2
Answer:
137 m²
Formula's:
- area of rectangle: length + width
- area of triangle: 1/2 * base * height
Explanation:
⇒ area of rec + area of rec + area of rec + area of triangle
⇒ 2 * 4 + 7 * 6 + 8 * 9 + 1/2 * 6 * 5
⇒ 8 + 42 + 72 + 15
⇒ 137 m²
Answer:
its B
Step-by-step explanation:
Hope it helps