What are the strengths and weaknesses of the executive branch?

Law

2 answers:

Jlenok [28]2 years ago

4 0

Answer:

Explanation:

"The simplest demonstration of weakness in the Executive Branch," Bundy said, "is its subordination to Congress in matters of appropriation and taxation." ... This makes it difficult, he said, for there ever to be "sustained, coordinated and energetic" Executive action.

nadezda [96]2 years ago

3 0

Answer:The simplest demonstration of weakness in the Executive Branch, is its subordination to Congress in matters of appropriation and taxation. He cited the present impasse over the tax increase as a case of Congress frustrating the Executive. Two other weakness of the Executive Branch, are "under-representation of the public interest" and lack of interconnection between parties legitimately involved.

Explanation:

You might be interested in

When there is a

Savatey [412]

Answer:

change in supply

Explanation:

4 0

2 years ago

How did the supreme court’s ruling in the trans-missouri freight association case strengthen the federal government’s power?.

Alborosie

Answer: It upheld the Sherman Antitrust Act's authority over railroads

Explanation:

3 0

1 year ago

If the activities of private security personnel are still subject to the law, then what is the reason for abuse in many private

Firdavs [7]

Answer: A mix of local, state regulations, and common law, vary from state to state.

Explanation: Edge

6 0

2 years ago

Which statement is NOT true about the U.S. Supreme Court?

ohaa [14]

Answer:

2 is false.

Explanation:

The supreme court does act as the last court of appeals (with cases regarding constitutional law and federal law), after local and state courts. It also hears cases that involve the US Constitution. Small Claim Courts settle local cases involving small amounts of money, not the Supreme Court. Therefore, 2 is false.

7 0

1 year ago

Read 2 more answers

A state owned a large natural gas field and took bids for its exploitation. The highest bid came from an interstate pipeline com

cestrela7 [59]

Answer: b. No, because the state acted as a market participant

Explanation:

The state in this instance was a market participant because they were acting as buyers who were looking for companies that could supply the service of exploiting their gas fields.

As a result, they have total discretion to pick whichever supplier they choose, regardless of the benefits or lack thereof, much like a normal buyer would do. The interstate company would therefore lose the case.

4 0

2 years ago