Realist and Liberal perspectives would agree that the international system is inherently anarchic
The notion that there is no supreme authority or sovereign in the world is known as anarchy in the study of international relations. There is no hierarchically superior, coercive authority that can settle conflicts, uphold the law, or regulate the system of international politics in an anarchic state. It is commonly acknowledged that anarchy serves as the foundation for international relations theory.
It is feasible for ordered ties between nations to be maintained in an anarchic international system, contrary to how anarchy is typically understood in the field of international relations. For the realist, liberal, neo- realist, and neo- liberal models of international relations, anarchy provides the underpinnings.
To learn more about Anarchy click here:
brainly.com/question/1133894
#SPJ4
In the Declaration of Independence the argument for freedom from British rule is based primarily on the social contract theory of the government that was developed by John Locke. According to this theory, the people had the right to select a new government because the existing government was not serving the people.
I believe the answer is: Functionalists
Functionalists believe that state of mind that exist in people mind consist of the awareness on their perspective function in society.
As people held more important functions among social group, those people tend to be held on higher social standing by other members.
Answer:
Developing countries are countries with economies that have a low gross domestic product (GDP) per capita and rely heavily on agriculture as the primary industry.
