Answer:
<h2>An expansionary monetary policy by the Federal Reserve would lead to an <u>increase </u> in the demand for US assets and a <u>depreciation</u> in the value of US dollars.Hence the correct answer is option D) or increase;depreciate.</h2>
Explanation:
An expansionary monetary policy commonly entails expansion of money supply thereby reducing the eventual interest rate in order to boost or stabilize the Aggregate Demand(AD) and overall output level or GDP in the economy.Now,as the domestic interest would fall in US due to the expansionary speculations and inflationary indications(increase in money supply),it would consequently lower the value of the US dollars relative to other foreign currencies.This implies that US dollar would depreciate compared to other foreign currencies.This possibility would encourage the importers and international investor or financiers to become more attracted towards the US goods,services and financial assets thereby increasing their demands.Therefore,a depreciation of US dollars would essentially lead to an increase in the demand for US assets in the international market as depreciation of US dollars would also lower the value of US assets in the international market.
Answer:
At this point, Simon has lost $1,000 of his money.
Explanation:
This can be determined by calculating the current value of Simon's investment as follows:
Initial amount invested = $8,000
Value of the investment on July 17 = Initial amount invested * (100% - Percentage of loss) = $8,000 * (100% - 50%) = $4,000
Value of the investment on October 17 = Value of the investment on July 17 * (100% + Percentage of increase) = $4,000 * (100% + 75%) = $7,000
Amount of loss on October 17 = Initial amount invested - Value of the investment on October 17 = $8,000 - $7,000 = $1,000
Therefore, at this point, Simon has lost $1,000 of his money.
Answer:
Option B. He will win
Explanation:
If Samuel is desiring to sue his employer in a circuit court because he thinks that the employer was negligent then he will have to sue under negligence Act, which says that the employer is obliged to take all necessary precautions and if found negligent then the court may apply contributory negligent theory as well as comparative negligent theory. These two negligent theories means that the employer was partly responsible for injury, which means that this would result in compensation to Samuel.
Hence it is more likely that Samuel will win the case.
<u>Explanation</u>:
Remember, Implicit cost refers to cost that do not involve monetary transactions by Jacques, while his Explicit cost includes all forms of direct payments made by Jacques to others while selling his boat.
<u>Therefore, the cost are assigned below:</u>
- The $50,000 salary Jacques could earn if he worked as a financial advisor= Implicit Cost
- The $15,000 rental income per year Jacques would receive if he chose to rent out his showroom= Implicit
- The wholesale cost of $430,000 and utility bills totaling $301,000 cost for the boats that Jacques pays the manufacturer= Explicit Cost
