1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Shtirlitz [24]
3 years ago
5

|hello what does this app do you wanna is the day you get your own car you want me to join you in a little room with me your so

cute omg was the way you are so beautiful and I love you so much I love y’all so much and I’m so beautiful and I love you so beautiful and I love you so much and I love you so much and I love you so much and I love you so much
Mathematics
2 answers:
Likurg_2 [28]3 years ago
5 0

Answer: aw thanks

Step-by-step explanation:

PIT_PIT [208]3 years ago
3 0
Awh i’m not sure who this is to but if it’s to anyone, thanks so much
You might be interested in
Find (18 × 106) + (5 × 104). A) 1.8005 × 106 B) 1.8005 × 107 C) 1.805 × 106 D) 1.805 × 107
Andrews [41]
The answer is D. Because (18 x 10^6) + (5 x 10^4) = 18050000. And the answer to 1.805 x 10^7 also equals 18050000, if you do the math.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
0.5<br> Which number is the same distance away from zero as -9?<br> -10<br> 0<br> 0 1<br> 9
Sonja [21]

Answer:

9

Step-by-step explanation:

Mathematically, OPPOSITES are the same distance away from zero, but on opposite sides of zero on the number line. Use the drawing tools to plot a point at the opposite of each colored point. <u>The absolute value of 0 is 0. Two numbers are opposites if they have the same absolute value but different signs. Opposites are the same distance from 0 on a number line, and they are on opposite sides of 0. The opposite of 0 is 0.</u>

8 0
3 years ago
Help me please! Thank you =D
UNO [17]

Answer:

2A=A+A

Step-by-step explanation:

2A=A*A, not A+A

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
For the rational function f(x)= 5x3-x/2x3 , identify any removable discontinuities.
Ierofanga [76]

Answer:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.

Step-by-step explanation:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s rece

3 0
3 years ago
Which expression does NOT have a Greatest Common Factor?
pogonyaev

Answer:

zzzzz tolog monalang yan

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • This week an employee is scheduled to work 6 hours each day Monday through Friday, and 3.5 hours on Saturday morning. If the emp
    6·1 answer
  • How do I find this expression?
    13·1 answer
  • Use the laplace transform to solve the initial value problem: y''+y=1, y(0)=2 and y'(0)=0
    14·1 answer
  • Solve for f.<br> 0.3 = 0.58 -0.7<br> How do it do it
    9·2 answers
  • What are the terms in the expression, 2 + 6 + 10b - 8a?
    7·1 answer
  • Find the value of 9x+4y when x=4 and y=-3
    8·1 answer
  • A market sells 7 oranges for $2.45. How much will 8 oranges cost?
    8·1 answer
  • Tell whether (-4, 3) is a solution of the system of linear inequalities.
    9·1 answer
  • Please answer 5-10 and get brainliest
    6·2 answers
  • Can someone please solve
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!