Step-by-step explanation:
I guess method 1 means to deal with whole factors.
x + 5 = (x - 2)(x + 5)
for (x + 5) <> 0 we can divide both sides by this factor :
1 = x - 2
x = 3
for the second solution we deal with
x + 5 = 0
x = -5
so, for x = -5 and x = 3 both functions deliver the same output, and these are the intersection points.
method 2 : we multiply the expression out and solve it then
x + 5 = (x - 2)(x + 5)
x + 5 = x² + 5x - 2x - 10 = x² + 3x - 10
0 = x² + 2x - 15
the general solution to such a square equation is
x = (-b ± sqrt(b² - 4ac))/(2a)
in our case
a = 1
b = 2
c = -15
x = (-2 ± sqrt(2² - 4×1×-15))/(2×1) =
= (-2 ± sqrt(4 + 60))/2 = (-2 ± sqrt(64))/2 = (-2 ± 8)/2 =
= -1 ± 4
x1 = -1 + 4 = 3
x2 = -1 - 4 = -5
and you get the 2 solutions again. as expected, they are the same as with method 1, of course.
It's C because you change 2/5 into 4/10 then you add 4/10+4/10 which equals 8/10 and is 1 mph. So you add another 2/10 which is an half of a half which equals 1/4. So C
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Use formula
Hence,
This expression is equal to
so we can equate the coefficients at powers of x:
Answer:
No.
Step-by-step explanation:
A quadrilateral with 3 obtuse angles is possible. You could have 100°+100°+100°+60° quadrilateral or whatever. As long as it's inner angles add up to 360°, it is possible.
Look at the angles to deturman if it is a right triangle
