Answer:
The correct answer is C. A judge could throw out the teen's confession unless the officer complies with the ruling in Miranda v. Arizona.
Explanation:
Miranda v. Arizona is a ruling of the United States Supreme Court from 1966. The case established the current practice whereby a suspect is required to read his or her rights (the so-called Miranda rights) without exception, which state the right to before a preliminary investigation of the suspect has begun.
That was the decision in Ernesto Miranda's trial. Miranda was arrested on suspicion of kidnapping and sexual assault of an 18-year-old girl on prima facie evidence. After two hours of questioning, Miranda signed the confession. However, he had never been informed of the possibility of meeting a legal adviser or of being silent, and that his confession could not be used against him. During the trial, Miranda's attorney, Alvin Moore, argued that confession would therefore not apply in court. Moore's objection was rejected and Miranda was sentenced to a lengthy prison sentence. The Arizona Supreme Court also upheld the ruling.
The United States Supreme Court, by a vote of 5 to 4, ruled that, due to the Fifth and Sixth Amendment to the Constitution, no confession would be valid unless the suspect was informed of his rights. The Fifth Amendment states that no one can be compelled to testify against himself and the Sixth Addendum secures access to a lawyer. Ernesto Miranda's judgment was overturned, but he was later sentenced to prison for the same case, based on other evidence.
The political party that died was the Federalist Party. This should be your correct answer I hope it is
Answer: Americans with Disabilities Act
Explanation: This scenario demonstrates a violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requires that all public buildings and public services be accessible to persons with disabilities. The ADA of 1990 is by far the most significant legislation protecting the rights of Americans with disabilities.
<em>Activity theorists contend that older people will only be content when they can still contribute to society and be helpful, primarily through engaging in </em><em>meaningful job for which they are compensated.</em>
<h3>What exactly is activity theory?</h3>
The implicit theory of aging, normal theory of aging, and lay theory of aging are other names for the activity theory, which puts out the idea that good ageing happens when older people remain active and retain social relationships.
<h3>What is the basis for the activity theory?</h3>
A conceptual framework called "activity theory" comes from the socio-cultural school of Russian psychology. The framework's fundamental idea is "activity," which is interpreted as the deliberate, transformative, and evolving interaction between actors (also known as "subjects") and the world (also known as "objects").
learn more about activity theory here <u>brainly.com/question/3691888</u>
#SPJ4
