Answer:
C. the benefit drived from the product
Explanation:
Is this supposed to be a multiple choice question? It is way fun to think about projects other people might be up to which carry outrageously high risk!
Restaurants are a common example -- there's a little bit of magic in whether a new restaurant will catch on and become popular.
Farming is pretty risky. You can do everything right and have a hail storm come and ruin the crops. That's why there are government programs and commodity markets that help farmers mitigate their risk -- because the rest of us who need to eat really need for people to be willing to farm!
Answer:
The advantages of using secondary data are several, but its main advantage is that it is the cheapest way to gather large sets of information. A lot of secondary data is available on the internet, so it is time saving. Using secondary data saves work, efforts and money.
We can also use secondary data to determine more specifically which primary data we need to gather, again saving resources.
Answer:
The correct answer is:
(a) -7783
(b) 6800
(c) -983
Explanation:
According to the given values in the question:
(a)
The price variance will be:
= 
= 
=
(Favorable)
(b)
The quantity variance will be:
= 
= 
= 
=
(Unfavorable)
(c)
The cost variance will be:
= 
= 
=
(Favorable)
Answer:
There will be a difference in the income .
Absorption costing income will be lower as it transfers all the fixed costs to the ending inventory.
Variable costing income will be higher as it does not transfer the fixed costs to the ending inventory.
The difference will be of $ 104000
Explanation:
Increase in units 8000
Variable Fixed
Unit manufacturing costs of the period $24.00 $10.00
Unit operating expenses of the period 8.00 3.00
Total Unit Costs $ 32.00 $ 13.00
The net operating income under variable costing for the year will be $ 13* 8000= $ 104000 Lower than the net operating income under absorption costing. This is because the all fixed costs will be treated as period cost rather than product costs.
In variable costing the ending inventory will be $104000 lower than the ending inventory under absorption costing because the fixed costs will not be allocated to products.
Under variable costing, the units in the ending inventory will be costed at $32 each.Under absorption costing, the units in the ending inventory will be costed at $32+ $ 13= $ 45 each.