Answer:
IRR= 21.86%
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Initial investment (PV)= $10,000
Cash flows (PMT)= $4,000 per year
Number or years (n)= 4
<u>It is extremely difficult to calculate the IRR using the formula. We will use the financial calculator.</u>
Function: CMPD
n= 4
I%= SOLVE = 21.86%
PV= 10,000
PMT= -4,000
IRR= 21.86%
In this case, you would want to avoid a win-lose situation.
1. You would want a win-win (where both parties feel as though they are gaining something from the transaction).
2. You can never go into an international negotiation with the same mentality as you would for in the US. Every culture is different and you should be aware of those differences.
3. You should not move too quickly between subjects. You should always ensure all parties understand and agree, which may take time.
Answer: Yes
Explanation:
If the difference in average spending amounts between the two groups is determined to be statistically significant, it would be legitimate to draw such a conclusion.
Why?
Those who were told that it was a Tuition rebate, a reward of sorts, had spent on average, $22.04 whilst those who thought it was simply bonus income had spent significantly less at $9.55.
This means that indeed there is a CAUSE and EFFECT conclusion to be drawn between what the money was called and how much was spent because it is clear that when called a tuition rebate, more of it is spent as opposed to it being called a Bonus income.
Answer:
Option B, have the same intercept with a flatter slope; fall.
Explanation:
Option B is correct because a more risk-averse person faces a steeper curve while the less risk-averse person faces a flatter slope. While the more risk-averse person has more return on the stock while the less risk-averse person has less return. Therefore, in the given situation, the SML will have the flatter slope and its return will fall. As it is a less risk-averse investor.
