Answer: I think you are correct I have the same question so wait until I vertifiy it.
Explanation:
Walter Chaplinsky was taken into custody by a police officer who wanted to prevent further public disturbance. While being taken to the police station, he proceeded to insult the police officer after receiving equal treatment from the crowd who was allegedly attacking him. The court denied him First Amendment because it considered that the insults produced by Chaplinsky did not contribute to any "expression of ideas".
Despite considering that it would be a correct action to apply this sort of action on a broader scale, it would certainly lead to the emergence of numerous court cases similar to this one. This would mean considerable additional workload to the courts, hindering the entity's efficiency.
Answer:
visual
Explanation:
The visual learner likes drawing, doodling, making posters and using colors to think rather than using words. if you see in this example they give you Pat does a time line.
Answer:
the Revised Uniform Partnership Act
Explanation:
Based on the information provided in the question, should a dispute arise, regarding the operations of Liana and Tara, the courts will look to The Revised Uniform Partnership Act (RUPA) to resolve the issues
the Revised Uniform Partnership Act is a model statute that dictates how partnerships should be set up and organized, as well as what the rights and duties of each of the partners should be. It is, as the name suggests, a revision of the Uniform Partnership Act (UPA), and has been adopted by almost every state.
In a representative democracy, people are choosing the representatives. They basically get to choose what type of person they want to make decisions for their country.
