Answer:
True.
Explanation:
The given statement would be considered true as it asserts a true claim about J.S. Mill's 'principle of liberty' denying the conception of 'victimless crime'. He stated that individual actions should only be restricted when it is causing damage to others. He proclaimed that "the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others". In simple terms, he stated that no one should be prevented from doing a specific action unless his/her actions are not invasive or harmful to the other's rights. Therefore, the given assertion is <u>true.</u>
It is definitely possible that the opposite of this question occurs. It is possible that a majority of voters might support liberalization even though it would hurt a lot of voters if implemented. This is because people do not always have their best interest at heart. Sometimes, this is because of poor information (people might not realize that something benefits them/affects them) while some other times it is because other factors do not let people see the truth (such as intense ideological or religious feeling).
1.Problem Identification
2.Agenda Building
3.Policy Formulation
4.Policy Adoption
5.Policy Implementation
6.Policy Evaluation.
They are likely to define themselves as what they likely believe in or what they wanted to be as they are not likely to live up with what they had learned when they are still a child nor adopted what their parents have thought them. It is likely that they define themselves as someone who they want to be defined or who they really are and not based on where they grew up.
Electrons, Protons and other ions.........
