The entire situation with the colonies revolting from British control wouldn't have happened without the Seven Years War (of which the section happening in the North American colonies is called the "French and Indian War").
The British only raised taxes, which is the thing that first upset the American Colonies, to pay down the debt from fighting that war.
The British wouldn't have been considering allowing the Catholic settlers from Canada to move into the Ohio Valley and to keep those from the American Colonies out if they hadn't won the war, since Canada would still have been French.
The American colonists would have had less grievances with the British for the way that the leadership of the British armies messed up in the Colonies if the war hadn't happened.
The American colonists wouldn't have had as many experienced combatants and leaders (Washington being a huge one that learned his skill in war fighting for the British) without the earlier war taking place.
To answer the question above as to which British leaders was primarily responsible for the policy of appeasement in the 1930, the answer is Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain but seeing the roots upon the appeasement is coming from the weakness seen from the post-world war I, a collective security arrangement was brought.
Explanation:
He studied law at Howard University. As counsel to the NAACP, he utilized the judiciary to champion equality for African Americans
Answer: I’ll tell you the negative and positive effects
Explanation:
So, as American became more industrial the population grew, more people came to cities, meaning more profit (money) which was good for buisness. And the government can set out a larger tax pay to benefit themselves, however that will make the the people mad and more likely to protest and boycot businesses .
