The answer is fales hope i helped
Answer:
a) attached below.
b) for $x < $5000 will cause taking the drug to be part of the Nash equilibrium
c) will make the athletes feel better because the value their payoff will increase
Explanation:
<u>a) 2 * 2 payoff matrix describing the decision faced by the athletes </u>
attached below
when both players take the drug the payoff for each player = $5000 - x
when neither player takes the drug the payoff for each player = $5000
When only one player takes the drug his payoff = $10000 - x
<u>b) If we consider the value of $x to be involved in the Nash equilibrium then </u>
; $5000 - $x > 0 becomes the best response
hence for $x < $5000 will cause taking the drug to be part of the Nash equilibrium
c) Lowering the negative effect of the drug ( i.e. when the value of x is reduced )
will make the athletes feel better because the value their payoff will increase
Answer:
b. $5,560
Explanation:
The computation of the total interest revenue is shown below:
The five equal annual year-end payments = $5,009
For five years, the total amount is
= $5,009 × 5 years
= $25,045
And, the present value of recording the note is $19,485
So, the total interest revenue earned would be
= Five years amount - present value of recording the note
= $25,045 - $19,485
= $5,560
Answer:
The law of diminishing marginal utility.
Explanation:
Marginal utility is basically satisfaction derived from consuming an extra unit of product. According to the law of diminishing marginal utility as consumption increases the marginal utility derived from each additional unit decreases.
So when we consume 1 chips marginal utility is high, then as more is consumed we still get some positive utility out of it but at a decreasing rate now. At some point this utility equals zero after which it starts declining as more chips are consumed because it is not providing any satisfaction now. Therefore the chips should be consumed only up to the point where the marginal utility equal zero.
