1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
DENIUS [597]
3 years ago
9

Those who believe the federal governement's powers should be narrowly interpreted are know as

Social Studies
1 answer:
kirza4 [7]3 years ago
6 0
Those who believe the federal government's powers should be narrowly interpreted are know as dual federalist. The federalism is a combination of unitary government and a confederation and in this type of government <span>two or more governments share power and authority over the same land and people.
</span><span>Dual federalism allows states and the federal government to exercise powers separately in areas of legitimate concern to them.</span>
You might be interested in
Under the constitution, who shared the power of making laws ?
baherus [9]
The Senate and the house of Representatives
5 0
3 years ago
. How do the presidential and parliamentary forms of government differ from one another? Responses
Elis [28]

Answer:

hope it helps you❤❤

Explanation:A government is the organization, machinery, or agency, through which a political unit exercises its authority, controls and administers public policy, and directs and controls the actions of its members or subjects [1]. The government makes laws, regulate economies, conduct relations with other countries, provide infrastructure and services, and maintain an army and a police force amongst others on behalf of the people of the country [2].

Democracy is any system of government in which the people have the rule. The ancient Greeks used the word democracy to mean government by the many in contrast to government by the few. They key of democracy is that the people hold ultimate power. Abraham Lincoln best captured this spirit by describing democracy as a government of the people, by the people, for the people.

Over the years there has been a dramatic growth in the number of political regimes that meet basic standards of procedural democracy. Such procedures include freedom of association and expression, competitive elections that determines who holds political power, and systematic constraints on the exercise of authority.

The establishment of democracy in countries with no prior democratic experience, its re-establishment in countries that had experienced periods of authoritarian rule, and the expansion in the number of independent states following the demise of European and Soviet communism led to the adoption of democracy in most countries.

Democratic governments are those that permit the nation’s citizens to manage their government either directly or through elected representatives. This is opposed to authoritarian governments that limit or prohibit the direct participation of its citizens. One of the fundamental aspects of constitutional design is the choice between presidential government, parliamentary government and a hybrid system that combines some aspects of these two.

Countries that have adopted a form of the parliamentarianism include the United Kingdom (UK), much of continental Europe, Israel, Japan, many of the former British colonies in Africa and Asia, and most Caribbean countries.

The purpose of this paper is to discuss some of the differences between the presidential and parliamentary systems of governance with a view to recommending a system for Ghana.

Key differences among the three systems (presidential, parliamentary and hybrid) include the extent to which the powers of government are separated functionally between branches, and in the powers one branch does or does not have over another.

In a presidential system, political and administrative powers are divided between the executive, legislative and judicial branches.

Presidential Government

In a presidential system, the President (who is the chief executive as well as the symbolic head of government) is chosen by a separate election from that of the legislature.

The US represents the strongest form of presidentialism, in the sense that the powers of the executive and legislative branches are separate, and legislatures often have significant powers.

Parliamentary Government

Parliamentary systems, unlike presidential systems, are typified by a fusion of powers between the legislative and executive branches. The Prime Ministermay be elected to the legislature in the same way that all other members are elected.

Parliamentary systems are characterized by no clear-cut separation of powers between the executive and legislative branches, leading to a different set of checks and balances compared to those found in presidential systems.

LEGISLATIVE – EXECUTIVE TERMS AND REMOVAL FROM OFFICE

A key difference between presidential and parliamentary systems lies in the power to remove a chief executive or to dissolve the legislature. In parliamentary systems, the chief executive’s term of office is directly linked to that of the legislature, while in presidential systems the terms are not linked.

Presidential Government

In a presidential system, in line with the notion of a separation of powers, presidents and members of the legislature are separately elected for a given length of time.

LEGISLATIVE FUNCTION

In parliamentary, presidential and hybrid systems, the legislative body discusses political, economic and social issues and is required to legitimize new laws.

8 0
3 years ago
keisha puts herself down all the time. she is very negative about everything and doubts her ability to succeed. keisha is displa
vagabundo [1.1K]
The answer would be D) Low self-esteem.
4 0
3 years ago
Strings attached to federal grants are
My name is Ann [436]

Answer:

federal mandates

Explanation:

have a nice day :)

4 0
2 years ago
WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST READ THE QUESTION
aleksandrvk [35]

Answer:

Personally I feel like Jimmy Carter (1924 - 39th president of the United States) has greatly influenced Georgia's history. If a leader is dishonest it is very hard to trust anything they say or do. Of real world leaders, we don’t honesty a lot, but US President Jimmy Carter definitely had honest qualities. Jimmy Carter was arguably the most honest US president. While his honesty cost him his 2nd term in office, it also saved us from a war in Iran (Frank). Many lives and lots money would’ve gone into a war, and so this shows that honesty.

Explanation:

Hope this helps you as much as intended.

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • The diversity of religions within the Arab, Persian, and Kurdish ethnic groups in Southwest Asia is a major contributing factor
    12·1 answer
  • Which organization did Senator Joseph McCarthy first accuse of housing members of the Communist Party? the U.S. State Department
    14·1 answer
  • Which of these is true about the regulations set up for childcare facilities? Regulations for childcare facilities are not enfor
    5·1 answer
  • Your best advice to a friend who is experiencing severe depression would be:
    6·1 answer
  • Suppose that some investors have decided that economic and financial uncertainty have made the prospect of investing in domestic
    15·1 answer
  • Consciously creating an environment where passion is both encouraged and developed starts at the top through the communication o
    13·1 answer
  • What were two main political parties that were formed
    13·2 answers
  • The American Law Institute reduces complexity and uncertainty of multiple judicial opinions by compiling____________.
    11·1 answer
  • A practical benefit of ________________is that it requires little in the way of resources which can be helpful for organizations
    14·1 answer
  • Why is studying the different branches of science is important?
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!