Answer:
Objective function:
Maximize Z: 30P1 + 25P2 + 28P3
Subject to: 2.00P1 + 1.50P2 + 3.00P3 ≤ 450 (Department A constraint)
2.50P1 + 2.00P2 + P3 ≤ 350 (Department B constraint)
0.25P1 + 0.25P2 + 0.25P3 ≤ 50 (Department C constraint)
P1, P2, P3 ≥ 0 (Non-negativity)
Explanation:
The objective function is formulated from the contribution margin of the three products. For instance, the contribution of Product 1 is $30, the contribution of Product 2 is $25 and the contribution of Product 3 is $28. Thus, the objective function will be 30P1 + 25P2 + 28P3.
The constraints were obtained from the departmental labour hours requirements for each product. For instance, Product 1 requires 2 hours in department A, Product 2 requires 1.50 hours in department A and Product 3 requires 3 hours in Department A. Thus, the constraint will be 2.00P1 + 1.50P2 + 3.00P3.
Productivity, hope this helps:)
Answer: A glass ceiling
Explanation:
A glass ceiling is basically refers to the hidden barrier that monitoring the women advancement and also the minority level based on the leadership position, careers and also the discriminate in the workplace.
According to the given scenario, the given situation suggesting about the presence of a glass ceiling in the Li's organization due to the discrimination in the workplace on the basis of achievement an also the high qualification.
Therefore, Glass ceiling is the correct answer.
Answer:
2400
Explanation:
The HHI is calculated by squaring the market share of each firm in the industry.
30² + 25² + 25² + 15² + 5² = 2400
Answer:
The correct answer is B. result from the political bias toward immediate benefits and deferred costs.
Explanation:
While many people run hysterically on the streets begging politicians to act in the face of the threat of climate change, many people, young and old, may be demanding the same type of action, but to fix the unfunded passive systems.
By extending eligibility and increasing the benefits of a pay-per-use system while at the same time having fewer children to finance it, previous generations have left a fearsome financial obligation. Either taxes will increase dramatically for tomorrow's workers, lowering their standard of living, or benefits will fall for tomorrow's retirees, lowering their standard of living. A group will feel very angry.
These problems were anticipated even when politicians were raising payments, but each elected government simply kicked the can and allowed things to continue as usual.
Social security systems and pension funds are actuarially not funded systems. There is no obligation for this generation to have children at the same rate as previous generations. Therefore, when those born in the 1950s reach retirement age in the next century, their stipends will feel more like a burden due to the ranks of non-active members of society that will depend on their contributions to live.
